Your February update from AMI Chief Executive Robert Sinclair

AMI Chief Executive Robert Sinclair gives his February update, discussing the latest issues in the industry and how we can tackle them…

Tackling barriers: The Protection Gap

AMI Senior Policy Adviser Stacy Penn discusses the Perception Gap in the protection market, in this article originally published in Moneyfacts…

The FCA in the insurance space – a more assertive regulator?

Following introduction of Consumer Duty, we have seen signs the FCA is shifting towards becoming a more assertive regulator…

The Perception Gap

AMI Senior Policy Adviser Stacy Penn discusses the findings from AMI’s latest Protection Viewpoint – The Perception Gap, in this article written for TMA Club…

Consumer Duty: The next steps – what does 2024 have in store?

On 6th December 2023, the FCA hosted a webinar titled Consumer Duty: The next steps – we draw out the key points of relevance to mortgage intermediary firms…

Your January update from AMI Chief Executive Robert Sinclair

AMI Chief Executive Robert Sinclair gives his January update, reflecting on the challenges and opportunities of the year ahead…

Edit Content

Log in here for full access to all our great content


Please log in below with your username (which is your email address), using all lower-case letters.


Forgotten your password?
No problem, simply tell us you have forgotten your password to receive instructions instantly via email.

Having problems logging in?
If you are a current member but are unable to login, please first make sure you are using all lower-case letters for your username/email address. If you still have difficulties, please contact us via email at so we can rectify your problem.

Not a member?
Learn more about the benefits of becoming a member or apply online and we will be in touch.

As the number of Data Subject Access Requests channelled through lawyers and claims managers to intermediary firms, where the consumer had an interest only mortgage, sails towards 5,000 there are huge impacts on firms.  These fishing expeditions to see what is on file are very different to the historic PPI market.  There the DSAR fell on lenders who self-insure and pay from income.  With mortgage intermediaries, the DSAR indicates the likelihood of complaint or legal action therefore requires the firm to inform their Professional Indemnity (PI) Insurer who may well require the response to be reviewed by their lawyers.

This incurs a cost on day one as the legal fees will fall under the policy excess.  So, a small firm receiving 10 of these could have costs of circa £20k without anything substantive to defend.  This is a direct hit to profit.  We would expect the professional firms working on these, whether solicitors or FCA regulated CMCs, to be more sensitive to this than they appear.  We hope that they are only working on genuine cases of consumer complaint and not being generated by promotional work promising free money.

AMI is working with member firms on these cases as they develop and any firm receiving a request should speak to their PI insurer first.  Of more concern is that we are hearing that some mortgage holders have entered into agreements which finance the work being done on their behalf and that it is difficult to exit these agreements.  In that most of these mortgages will have been properly sold, that is a real concern.

As many of these cases could be time-barred that will leave these consumers with the costs.  Also, this is a product well reviewed by the FSA and FCA and still on sale.  Consumers have been getting public warnings on the product and notes from lenders on the need to talk to them.  This is also a product where if the customer wants to reduce the capital they can usually over-pay within the terms of the contract.  I still struggle to see the loss most of these consumers have unless they have been cash rich and not borrowing other money.

Robert Sinclair
Chief Executive, AMI
August 2020


Forgot Password?

Join Us