Consumer Duty – an update

Key Consumer Duty developments and recent communications issued by both AMI and the FCA, with commentary on implications for mortgage intermediary firms…

AR regime – updated AMI Q&A and deadline reminder

Having heard back from the FCA, we have updated AMI’s Q&A documenton the AR regime. We also wanted to remind firms of the upcoming 30 November 2023 deadline…

FCA application window open for firms approving promotions for unauthorised persons

Firms that approve financial promotions for unauthorised persons have until 6th February 2024 to apply for approver permission from the FCA…

FSCS levy and compensation figures update

The FSCS has released an update on its levy and compensation figures for 2023/24, as well as anticipated levy figures for 2024/25…

AMI unveils The Perception Gap, the fourth annual Protection Viewpoint

This Viewpoint features hot topics facing the industry, including value of advice, building trust, consumer buying habits and generational views & attitudes…

Your October update from AMI Chief Executive Robert Sinclair

AMI Chief Executive Robert Sinclair gives his October update, focusing on AMI’s Protection Viewpoint, new build and Consumer Duty…

Edit Content

Log in here for full access to all our great content


Please log in below with your username (which is your email address), using all lower-case letters.


Forgotten your password?
No problem, simply tell us you have forgotten your password to receive instructions instantly via email.

Having problems logging in?
If you are a current member but are unable to login, please first make sure you are using all lower-case letters for your username/email address. If you still have difficulties, please contact us via email at so we can rectify your problem.

Not a member?
Learn more about the benefits of becoming a member or apply online and we will be in touch.

As a trade body head representing the mortgage intermediary community the last few months have been tough.  The isolation of Covid has not suited me well.  I am not looking for sympathy but it has changed our approach to lobbying and how we have to work to influence regulators, lenders and firms.  New tricks.

At the start of Covid we saw FCA invoicing their fees with increases in their costs married to a step back by FOS from larger increases and the FSCS applying huge charges to investment and pension advice firms whilst mortgage brokers got off relatively lightly.

Last month however saw the FSCS advise that they were going to have to trawl the “Retail Pool” and ask for another £51m to add to the £41m they were taking from providers and the Life Distribution and Investment Intermediation (LDII) class to be paid in January 2021.   This brought the total compensation bill for 2020/21 for bad advice or products from failed firms to £712m.

It is anticipated that firms in the Home Finance Intermediation class will be required to pay an additional £2.3m contribution (circa 150% of the original payment for FSCS Home Finance Intermediation as per their 2020 FCA invoice) and firms within the General Insurance Distribution class will pay an extra £29.4m (circa 160% of the original payment for FSCS General Insurance Distribution as per firms 2020 FCA invoice).

What is more frightening is that the more than £300m compensation required in the LDII class shows no sign of abating.  The investment and pensions advice sector is up in arms and wants something done.  They blame the FCA for nor supervising the market properly; they blame FSCS for not being robust in defending cases and they blame the poor way that the costs are allocated.  Many want a product levy, but some want the expensive cake sliced differently.

I am very unhappy that the level of compensation in this LDII sector is again being visited on mortgage brokers.  It is not our game.  Anyone thinking of adding any undeserved liability to the mortgage and protection world will find myself and AMI standing in the way.

Let us be clear.  FSCS pays out on firms that have been declared in default.  Firms that no longer trade and have been wound up.  Not all such firms create a liability.  It is only where a bad product or poor advice is demonstrated that the scheme pays out.  These are firms that have done manifestly bad things.  Some end up in the scheme having lost cases at the Ombudsman and do not have enough capital to pay the compensation due.  But most close in an orderly manner and the liability only becomes obvious much later.

Over the last fifteen years, mortgage lenders have taken significant responsibility to monitor the quality of broker distribution.  We have had to see many brokers asked to leave the market as they have not been sharp enough dealing with fraudsters.  Or their network has had concerns over the quality of their advice or the type of business they wanted to focus on.  Our lender partners have helped train, monitor and feedback.  It has not been painless.

I have recently heard of one insurer who has been removing brokers from panel as they cannot demonstrate sufficient competence on their products and processes.  I see that as good news.  The investment and pensions sector needs to step up to the plate on this as well.

The manufacturing sector be it life companies, investment providers, pension schemes and administrators need to take more responsibility.  The industry needs to root our poor practice and behaviors and not just point the finger at the FCA.  They are not blameless, but if the industry is going to wait for them to sort themselves out, there may not be much industry left.

Robert Sinclair
Chief Executive, AMI


Forgot Password?

Join Us