Upcoming Webinar: what is a green mortgage?

The Green Mortgage Advice Initiative (GMAI) brings you a new webinar: What is a green mortgage. The event takes place on Monday 29th July…

Important fee changes for mortgage intermediary firms in 2024/25

The FCA has released its policy statement on the Fees & Levies payable by regulated firms for 2024/25 – we pull out the important fee changes…

AMI secures significant win for the protection industry

We are delighted that the FCA has accepted our argument that the protection industry should be out of scope of the Advice Guidance Boundary Review…

Mortgage Vision returns for 2024 with extra locations

This year’s Mortgage Vision events take place across the country in September and October, with some new locations added for 2024…

AMI Consumer Duty Factsheets update

Regulated firms are required to bring any closed products and services they continue to offer into the scope of Consumer Duty by 31 July 2024…

Your June ’24 update from AMI Chief Executive Robert Sinclair

AMI Chief Executive Robert Sinclair gives his June update in what has been a quiet month for the industry with the upcoming general election…

Edit Content

Log in here for full access to all our great content

 

Please log in below with your username (which is your email address), using all lower-case letters.

 

Forgotten your password?
No problem, simply tell us you have forgotten your password to receive instructions instantly via email.

Having problems logging in?
If you are a current member but are unable to login, please first make sure you are using all lower-case letters for your username/email address. If you still have difficulties, please contact us via email at info@a-m-i.org.uk so we can rectify your problem.

Not a member?
Learn more about the benefits of becoming a member or apply online and we will be in touch.

Mar 19 – Changes to FOS

This month the FCA announced it is ploughing ahead with increasing the award limit for the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) from 1 April.  Seemingly the majority of those who responded to its proposals strongly disagreed, including AMI, yet the FCA has said “this has not changed our view” and plans to implement all of its proposals unchanged – a significant shift in the regulatory framework with very little notice.  The Senior Managers & Certification Regime stemmed from legislation and has given the industry a practical lead time to prepare.  This sudden review of FOS was decided by the FCA who has given firms an unnecessarily arbitrary deadline.

The original purpose of FOS has now changed.  It was set up to cater for cases that could be dealt with speedily and by using dispute resolution techniques to gain agreement. Cases above these levels were deemed to be more appropriate for legal decisioning in courts based on contract law. By more than doubling the compensation limit the FCA has lost sight of this.  When the industry supported the innovative introduction of the safety nets of FOS and the Financial Services Compensation Scheme it was important that these were limited by scope and the scale of compensation. Continual expansion of both risks users of financial services taking less responsibility for their actions and decisions.

The FCA’s idea that these changes are appropriate is a worrying stance.  In its feedback statement, the FCA has pointed out that it has increased its estimates of the number of claims paid above the current limit.  It however seems to miss the point.  This is not the first time we are seeing an over-reliance and focus on data analysis, assumptions and theories, which are resulting in a siloed and ultimately flawed approach detached from reality.  Despite no previous acknowledgement of the regulatory framework, in its response the FCA suddenly decided to draw international comparison to justify its decision without further research or comment – the new £350,000 limit is “significantly below the roughly £600,000 limit” in Australia, therefore the UK legal basis on which FOS was set up is seemingly irrelevant.

There appears to be a lack of balance in the regular expansion of the FCA’s remit as we continue to see a widening of scope every time any “harm” is identified without any reflection on whether this is appropriate or with sufficient justification.

Firms have less than a month to update their information on complaints handling and to train staff on the new, complex limits.  The one month that firms have been given is all because the FCA thought it was “logical” to align the timings with the expansion of remit to include larger SMEs.  However it hasn’t considered that the SME proposals were first floated three years ago with a formal consultation in January 2018.  Claiming that firms should “already be planning” for the new award limits as the consultation was published in October reaffirms what the regulator considers to be a true consultation process.  Unfortunately the realisation this has been another consultation in name only is unsurprising given the noticeable shift in the regulatory approach over recent years.

Aileen Lees
Head of Policy

March 2019

X

Forgot Password?

Join Us