Your February update from AMI Chief Executive Robert Sinclair

AMI Chief Executive Robert Sinclair gives his February update, discussing the latest issues in the industry and how we can tackle them…

Tackling barriers: The Protection Gap

AMI Senior Policy Adviser Stacy Penn discusses the Perception Gap in the protection market, in this article originally published in Moneyfacts…

The FCA in the insurance space – a more assertive regulator?

Following introduction of Consumer Duty, we have seen signs the FCA is shifting towards becoming a more assertive regulator…

The Perception Gap

AMI Senior Policy Adviser Stacy Penn discusses the findings from AMI’s latest Protection Viewpoint – The Perception Gap, in this article written for TMA Club…

Consumer Duty: The next steps – what does 2024 have in store?

On 6th December 2023, the FCA hosted a webinar titled Consumer Duty: The next steps – we draw out the key points of relevance to mortgage intermediary firms…

Your January update from AMI Chief Executive Robert Sinclair

AMI Chief Executive Robert Sinclair gives his January update, reflecting on the challenges and opportunities of the year ahead…

Edit Content

Log in here for full access to all our great content


Please log in below with your username (which is your email address), using all lower-case letters.


Forgotten your password?
No problem, simply tell us you have forgotten your password to receive instructions instantly via email.

Having problems logging in?
If you are a current member but are unable to login, please first make sure you are using all lower-case letters for your username/email address. If you still have difficulties, please contact us via email at so we can rectify your problem.

Not a member?
Learn more about the benefits of becoming a member or apply online and we will be in touch.

Mortgage advice is a crucial part of the financial landscape for many.  Ensuring it is effective must be a core part of the work of the FCA.  However the costs that it thinks the industry must shoulder is worrying.

In 2009 when the bill for regulating intermediaries ticked over £10m most saw this more than doubling in costs since FSA acquired responsibility from the MCCB in 2004 as a milestone.  This was nothing compared to the 32% hike in 2010 to fund the work to be undertaken in the Mortgage Market Review.  Despite the pain, the industry swallowed hard, paid the fees and worked with the regulator to implement the agreed plans and build better, more compliant firms with significant compliance and risk support that did not exist pre-crisis.  Verbally it was inferred that some of these costs were one-off and project based and would recede once MMR was implemented.

Inflationary increases prevailed until 2015, when we received another explosion in costs ascribed to the Mortgage Credit Directive and a need to build a new shiny competition vehicle within the FCA.  The Competition and Markets Authority and their approach is not enough – Financial Services needs its own special breed of competition economists and lawyers to pick over what remains of the advice industry following all improvements ushered in by RDR and MMR.

The last two rounds of FCA fees reviews introduced a further 16% increase in fees on mortgage advisers, for what is the same industry we have always had.  A fee block charged £10.9m in 2009, then £15.7m in 2015 will be charged £18.2m in 2016.  In this time direct supervision of mortgage advice firms has evaporated so we have no direct access to advice and help.  In addition firms are carrying the yoke of a regulator that has significantly failed to police effectively, meaning the costs being levied through the FSCS continue to escalate.  It cannot be right that the FCA is allowed to add cost to firms without any accountability for its own failings.

Firms have the millstone of risk and costs around their neck with a regulator that thinks they have an open cheque book.


Forgot Password?

Join Us