Tackling barriers: The Protection Gap

AMI Senior Policy Adviser Stacy Penn discusses the Perception Gap in the protection market, in this article originally published in Moneyfacts…

The FCA in the insurance space – a more assertive regulator?

Following introduction of Consumer Duty, we have seen signs the FCA is shifting towards becoming a more assertive regulator…

The Perception Gap

AMI Senior Policy Adviser Stacy Penn discusses the findings from AMI’s latest Protection Viewpoint – The Perception Gap, in this article written for TMA Club…

Consumer Duty: The next steps – what does 2024 have in store?

On 6th December 2023, the FCA hosted a webinar titled Consumer Duty: The next steps – we draw out the key points of relevance to mortgage intermediary firms…

Your January update from AMI Chief Executive Robert Sinclair

AMI Chief Executive Robert Sinclair gives his January update, reflecting on the challenges and opportunities of the year ahead…

Deadline reminder for approvers of financial promotions for unauthorised persons

An important update from the FCA on the 6th February deadline for approving financial promotions for unauthorised persons…

Edit Content

Log in here for full access to all our great content


Please log in below with your username (which is your email address), using all lower-case letters.


Forgotten your password?
No problem, simply tell us you have forgotten your password to receive instructions instantly via email.

Having problems logging in?
If you are a current member but are unable to login, please first make sure you are using all lower-case letters for your username/email address. If you still have difficulties, please contact us via email at info@a-m-i.org.uk so we can rectify your problem.

Not a member?
Learn more about the benefits of becoming a member or apply online and we will be in touch.

As an industry we have positively subscribed to both FOS and FSCS as important safety nets for consumers when things go wrong. Whilst many in the investment space are critical of FOS, the mortgage fraternity are mostly supportive.  Where real pain is being suffered is the rising tide of failed investment advice firms falling into FSCS default and good firms picking up the costs.  The historic classifications are not appropriate to the world today and need to be changed as soon as possible.  Also we fully understand that the Chancellor thought it wrong that Banks should benefit from fines levied on their brothers, so sequestered the funds for charitable benefit.  If he had limited this to Banks it would have been fair.

By taking this from all authorised firms, the benefit of fee reductions to good firms from the fines on bad has been lost.  The good firms have lost out in business to those who cheated and have to pay a second time for compensation with no fee reduction where the FCA has caught up with the bad boys.

Firms need to tell their MP’s and the House of Lords that this was unfair.  Yes to stripping the banks, but not the small advice firms that have bought into FSCS with the concept that offset from the bad would reduce their bill.  If we cannot have our money back, then we need a new contract that is based on a fairer system so that the toxic products have paid towards their solution.  A product levy is the future unless we can have our fines back. 


Forgot Password?

Join Us