What should ‘holistic advice’ really mean?

AMI Chief Executive Robert Sinclair discusses his interpretation of holistic advice and what it means for the industry…

Industry must protect the mental health of advisers – Robert Sinclair

We know that mental health and finances are intrinsically linked, and that’s not just when it comes to our customers…

Finalised guidance on financial promotions on social media

As part of their bid to tackle poor quality financial promotions on social media, the FCA has released their finalised social media guidance…

Your April ’24 update from AMI Chief Executive Robert Sinclair

AMI Chief Executive Robert Sinclair gives his April update, including the Mortgage Charter and AMI’s thoughts on the FCA Fees & Levies proposals…

April 2024 Latest FOS complaints – AMI comments

Latest FOS complaints that may be of interest to mortgage intermediary firms, including AMI’s comments…

FCA Consultation on Fees & Levies for 2024/25

Members may have seen that the FCA issued their annual consultation on the fees charged to firms on Tuesday 9th March – AMI comments…

Edit Content

Log in here for full access to all our great content


Please log in below with your username (which is your email address), using all lower-case letters.


Forgotten your password?
No problem, simply tell us you have forgotten your password to receive instructions instantly via email.

Having problems logging in?
If you are a current member but are unable to login, please first make sure you are using all lower-case letters for your username/email address. If you still have difficulties, please contact us via email at info@a-m-i.org.uk so we can rectify your problem.

Not a member?
Learn more about the benefits of becoming a member or apply online and we will be in touch.

For the last four years UK authorities have been working jointly with industry to pursue an alternative and more robust interest rate benchmark to LIBOR.  Although it could be said to have a number of weaknesses, its manipulation resulting in £757m of fines was the final nail in its coffin, leading to it needing proper replacement.  Last month we saw the next step in the move away from LIBOR with financial regulators writing to major banks and insurers asking how they are preparing for its withdrawal in 2021.

Despite the scandals there are still some lenders whose products reference LIBOR.  Firms should be mindful of these changes when recommending a product that tracks or reverts to LIBOR.  Understanding lenders’ transition plans, particularly which rate they will be replacing LIBOR with and any contractual variations proposed is key as well as considering any risks to the consumer.

This isn’t the only rate risk that firms should be accounting for when advising on a product.  Are consumers made aware that some products track the lender’s own ‘base rate’ rather than the Bank of England base rate?  And where the lender’s rate does not guarantee to follow the Bank of England rate, are the implications explained?

There is also a real risk that the mortgage will be securitised away which increases the likelihood of trapped borrowers. The FCA has been looking at this as part of the mortgages market study, in particular how consumers of inactive lenders and firms outside the regulatory perimeter can switch to a new rate.

Whilst price, criteria and service standards are typically seen as the key factors in any adviser’s recommendation, firms should be aware of these potential product risks as part of their ongoing due diligence of lenders, incorporating this into the advice process where necessary.  Brokers could be held liable under their regulatory responsibility to consider financial strength when advising on selection of a provider.  Surprisingly, it might not be all about the cheapest price!

Aileen Lees
Senior Policy Adviser

October 2018


Forgot Password?

Join Us