Consumer Duty – an update

Key Consumer Duty developments and recent communications issued by both AMI and the FCA, with commentary on implications for mortgage intermediary firms…

AR regime – updated AMI Q&A and deadline reminder

Having heard back from the FCA, we have updated AMI’s Q&A documenton the AR regime. We also wanted to remind firms of the upcoming 30 November 2023 deadline…

FCA application window open for firms approving promotions for unauthorised persons

Firms that approve financial promotions for unauthorised persons have until 6th February 2024 to apply for approver permission from the FCA…

FSCS levy and compensation figures update

The FSCS has released an update on its levy and compensation figures for 2023/24, as well as anticipated levy figures for 2024/25…

AMI unveils The Perception Gap, the fourth annual Protection Viewpoint

This Viewpoint features hot topics facing the industry, including value of advice, building trust, consumer buying habits and generational views & attitudes…

Your October update from AMI Chief Executive Robert Sinclair

AMI Chief Executive Robert Sinclair gives his October update, focusing on AMI’s Protection Viewpoint, new build and Consumer Duty…

Edit Content

Log in here for full access to all our great content


Please log in below with your username (which is your email address), using all lower-case letters.


Forgotten your password?
No problem, simply tell us you have forgotten your password to receive instructions instantly via email.

Having problems logging in?
If you are a current member but are unable to login, please first make sure you are using all lower-case letters for your username/email address. If you still have difficulties, please contact us via email at so we can rectify your problem.

Not a member?
Learn more about the benefits of becoming a member or apply online and we will be in touch.

For the last four years UK authorities have been working jointly with industry to pursue an alternative and more robust interest rate benchmark to LIBOR.  Although it could be said to have a number of weaknesses, its manipulation resulting in £757m of fines was the final nail in its coffin, leading to it needing proper replacement.  Last month we saw the next step in the move away from LIBOR with financial regulators writing to major banks and insurers asking how they are preparing for its withdrawal in 2021.

Despite the scandals there are still some lenders whose products reference LIBOR.  Firms should be mindful of these changes when recommending a product that tracks or reverts to LIBOR.  Understanding lenders’ transition plans, particularly which rate they will be replacing LIBOR with and any contractual variations proposed is key as well as considering any risks to the consumer.

This isn’t the only rate risk that firms should be accounting for when advising on a product.  Are consumers made aware that some products track the lender’s own ‘base rate’ rather than the Bank of England base rate?  And where the lender’s rate does not guarantee to follow the Bank of England rate, are the implications explained?

There is also a real risk that the mortgage will be securitised away which increases the likelihood of trapped borrowers. The FCA has been looking at this as part of the mortgages market study, in particular how consumers of inactive lenders and firms outside the regulatory perimeter can switch to a new rate.

Whilst price, criteria and service standards are typically seen as the key factors in any adviser’s recommendation, firms should be aware of these potential product risks as part of their ongoing due diligence of lenders, incorporating this into the advice process where necessary.  Brokers could be held liable under their regulatory responsibility to consider financial strength when advising on selection of a provider.  Surprisingly, it might not be all about the cheapest price!

Aileen Lees
Senior Policy Adviser

October 2018


Forgot Password?

Join Us