Your February update from AMI Chief Executive Robert Sinclair

AMI Chief Executive Robert Sinclair gives his February update, discussing the latest issues in the industry and how we can tackle them…

Tackling barriers: The Protection Gap

AMI Senior Policy Adviser Stacy Penn discusses the Perception Gap in the protection market, in this article originally published in Moneyfacts…

The FCA in the insurance space – a more assertive regulator?

Following introduction of Consumer Duty, we have seen signs the FCA is shifting towards becoming a more assertive regulator…

The Perception Gap

AMI Senior Policy Adviser Stacy Penn discusses the findings from AMI’s latest Protection Viewpoint – The Perception Gap, in this article written for TMA Club…

Consumer Duty: The next steps – what does 2024 have in store?

On 6th December 2023, the FCA hosted a webinar titled Consumer Duty: The next steps – we draw out the key points of relevance to mortgage intermediary firms…

Your January update from AMI Chief Executive Robert Sinclair

AMI Chief Executive Robert Sinclair gives his January update, reflecting on the challenges and opportunities of the year ahead…

Edit Content

Log in here for full access to all our great content


Please log in below with your username (which is your email address), using all lower-case letters.


Forgotten your password?
No problem, simply tell us you have forgotten your password to receive instructions instantly via email.

Having problems logging in?
If you are a current member but are unable to login, please first make sure you are using all lower-case letters for your username/email address. If you still have difficulties, please contact us via email at so we can rectify your problem.

Not a member?
Learn more about the benefits of becoming a member or apply online and we will be in touch.

The Mortgage Market Review rightly recognised the need to establish, through advice, not what the customer thinks they want but what they genuinely need, as being a core cornerstone of the future market.  The move from the pre-MMR position of many customers merely selecting the cheapest product via a non-advised offering to receiving advice has challenged the ability of many lenders to deliver that cost effectively.

With intermediary share of completions estimated at £170 billion by the end of 2016, compared to direct completions estimated at £70 billion, perhaps it’s understandable why some lenders are starting to feel threatened.  Or is it?  The relationship between brokers and lenders should be viewed as a partnership rather than as competition.  This perception of ‘an imbalance’ is particularly skewed when uncovering the market of product transfers, which don’t appear in published figures. Estimated at an extra £100 billion of completions, with approximately 85% of this market direct and on an execution-only basis, the size of this market is significant and some are focusing to increase this further.

Genuine execution-only can be appropriate for a proportion of customers.  There are strict rules around this, and quite rightly so, in order to protect the customer.  Attempts to increase execution-only business on a widespread basis should be viewed with caution.  Financially incentivising customers not to take advice or offering a limited number of products to a customer under the guise of execution only are not just examples of extremely worrying behaviour but warrant regulatory scrutiny.

Anything that dilutes the opportunity for customers to benefit from advice (whether intermediated or direct), which includes the protections afforded by the Financial Ombudsman Scheme and Financial Services Compensation Scheme, risks moving the market significantly backwards.

Aileen Lees
AMI Senior Policy Adviser


Forgot Password?

Join Us